'%20id='ico-down'%20stroke='%23000000'%20stroke-width='1.5'%3e%3cg%20transform='translate(1092.250000,%20254.750000)'%3e%3cpolyline%20id='Path-2-Copy-4'%20transform='translate(5.500000,%202.750000)%20scale(1,%20-1)%20rotate(-180.000000)%20translate(-5.500000,%20-2.750000)%20'%20points='0%200%205.5%205.5%2011%200'%3e%3c/polyline%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/svg%3e){kind=small}
A group of member states is seeking to prolong EU funding for cross-border natural gas projects – contrary to the European Commission’s plans to remove all support for such infrastructure, according to a draft document seen by EUobserver.
The so-called TEN-E regulation determines which energy cross-border infrastructure projects in the EU are eligible for public funds through the European Investment Bank – listed under the so-called “Projects of Common Interest” (PCI).
But Brussels proposed a revision of the TEN-E rules in December, excluding dedicated support for oil and gas infrastructure – in a bid to align a key piece of energy policy with the Green Deal and the EU’s 2050 climate-neutrality goal.
However, some member states are challenging that position, under a proposal drafted by the Portuguese presidency – triggering outrage from green groups.
“Portugal is in the front line of decarbonisation. Therefore, it is not acceptable that our country, as EU presidency, supports continued natural gas investments, in stark contradiction with the EU’s climate neutrality goals,” said Francisco Ferreira, president of the Lisbon-based NGO ZERO.
The leaked proposal from the European Council, due to be discussed by EU ambassadors this week, proposes supporting projects until 2029 in which existing gas infrastructure is modified to mix hydrogen with natural gas.
This process, known as “blending”, is considered one of the main sticking point of the discussion.
“If the blending happens this can lock investments in a mix of natural gas and fossil hydrogen for years. If the blending does not materialise then there is a lock-in on the modernised natural gas infrastructure,” a EU diplomat told EUobserver, arguing that it is “a lose-lose scenario”.
“There is a blocking minority against blending because of risks of market fragmentation and lock-in of natural gas,” another EU diplomat said.
Meanwhile, the condition set out in the EU Commission proposal, that hydrogen must come from renewable sources, has also been expanded to include “low-carbon gases” – which could open the door for the fossil-fuel industry to lock in investment for years.
“This is absolutely a failure on behalf of the Portuguese presidency to reach a progressive deal with member states that is fit for the climate emergency the world is facing,” said Tara Connolly from Global Witness.
“It seems their strategy, despite claiming to stand for real climate action, was to accept positions that satisfied the lowest common denominators, in order to get a deal at any cost,” she added.
See original article in the https://euobserver.com/climate/151983