What we know about Russian election hacking
With Russia and its leader Vladimir Putin in Washington's crosshairs, blamed for launching cyberattacks to interfere in the US elections, Moscow has demanded to be shown some proof..
Therein lies the problem: incontrovertible evidence determining the identity of the hackers and the reason for their attacks will be hard, if not impossible, to find.
Here is what is known so far about the “who, what and why” of the hacking strikes during the recent US election campaign.
– Who hacked what? –
— In May US National Intelligence Director James Clapper warns of cyberattacks against the campaigns, without specific reference to any source.
— On June 15, CrowdStrike, a cybersecurity firm hired by the Democratic National Committee to investigate break-ins in its computer systems, points to two separate Russian intruders.
“Both adversaries engage in extensive political and economic espionage for the benefit of the government of the Russian Federation and are believed to be closely linked to the Russian government’s powerful and highly capable intelligence services,” it says.
CrowdStrike says hacking entity Cozy Bear, linked to Russia’s military intelligence, intercepted Democratic Party communications from June 2015 on, while Fancy Bear, linked to Russia’s secret services (FSB), targeted and stole DNC dossiers related to then Republican frontrunner Donald Trump beginning in March.
A month after this analysis is reported, the WikiLeaks website begins publishing the pirated material.
— On October 7, the 17 US intelligence agencies conclude the Russian government is behind the cyberattacks and that they are “intended to interfere with the US election process”.
Meanwhile, WikiLeaks publishes a near-daily dose of emails stolen from the Gmail account of John Podesta, chairman of Hillary Clinton’s campaign, up until just before the election. SecureWorks, another cybersecurity consultant, says Podesta’s emails were hacked by the same groups who hacked the DNC.
— On December 9-10, the Washington Post and New York Times report that the CIA concluded Moscow intended to help Trump’s campaign against that of Clinton by releasing the hacked material.
The billionaire president-elect dismisses the CIA conclusion as “ridiculous”. Russia denies all claims.
— On December 12 , leading Congressional lawmakers call for an investigation into Russia’s role in the cyberattacks.
— On December 15, Republican Senator Lindsey Graham reveals his campaign accounts were also hacked by Russians ahead of the November vote.
— Also on December 15, Obama vows US retaliation, saying, “I think there is no doubt that when any foreign government tries to impact the integrity of our elections that we need to take action.”
– Could Russia pull this off? –
The talents of Russian state-serving hackers are now the stuff of legend. Descended from the tradition of Soviet economic espionage, they broadened the scope to also probe and punish political targets.
The first salvo was fired against Baltic neighbouring state Estonia in 2007, whose main internet sites crashed after being flooded with surplus requests, in a so-called distributed denial of service, or DDoS, attack. It knocked out the national emergency hotline for more than an hour.
Other Russian neighbours including Ukraine and Georgia, as well as states which have strained relations with Moscow, have endured similar attacks.
The US election hacking looks like a Russian state-sponsored strike, Andrey Soldatov, editor-in-chief of Agenta.ru and a specialist on Russian secret services and cybercrime, told AFP.
“Given Russia’s history of cyberattacks, I would think this is a case of coordination between private and government actors, involving informal actors coordinated by those at the highest levels,” Soldatov said.
The campaign hackers did not need innovative technical skills to strike; simple “phishing” emails, which invite email readers to click on a link, were enough to get the hackers in.
– All for Trump? –
Experts have not converged on whether Russia set out to help Trump clinch a White House victory, as Clinton’s team says.
Soldatov says it is likely that the Kremlin sought to weaken the position of the former secretary of state, whom it views as “a kind of sworn enemy” and has blamed for inciting unrest after Russia’s own elections in 2011.
“But I’m not certain the principal goal was to get Trump elected. These guys at the Kremlin are believers in conspiracy theories,” he said, noting that up until the November 8 vote Moscow had warned that potential voter fraud could steal the election from Trump.