topics
tools
Expatica countries
Index Last Var.(%)
BEL 20 2117.66 -0.08
DAX 6323.19 -0.26
IBEX 30 6401.2 -2.17
CAC 40 3042.97 -0.16
FTSE 100 5356.34 0.09
AEX 292.76 0.00
DJIA 12454.83 -0.60
Nasdaq 2837.53 -0.07
FTSE MIB 13057.26 -0.74
TSX Composite 11566.15 -0.09
ASX 4120.2 0.96
Hang seng 18800.99 0.47
Straits Times 2787.22 0.52
ISEQ 20 501.76 0.16
You are here: Home News Dutch News OM denies hiding evidence in murder case
Enlarge font Decrease font Text size


06/09/2005OM denies hiding evidence in murder case

7 September 2005

AMSTERDAM — The public prosecution service (OM) made "indisputable mistakes" in the case against the man wrongfully convicted of killing Nienke Kleiss, 10, the top legal official in the Netherlands has admitted.

But Harm Brouwer, chairman of the national leadership of the OM, insisted on news programme NOVA on Tuesday evening that evidence was not concealed by the prosecution.

He denied suggestions made on Monday in another news programme that DNA evidence proving the accused man Cees B. was innocent was withheld from the defence.

Cees B, 33, served four years of an 18-year sentence for the murder of Nienke Kleiss, 10, before he was freed in January this year when another man apparently admitted to killing the girl.

Nienke and her 11-year-old friend Maikel were attacked by a man in the Beatrixpark in Schiedam in June 2000. Nienke was raped and murdered, but Maikel survived by pretending to be dead after he was severely assaulted.

Brouwer said the national forensics institute (NFI), which carried out tests on items collected by police from the murder scene, can decide whether all findings are included in its final report.

He said the NFI did not use the DNA evidence in the case against B. because the experts felt it could have come from anywhere.

When NOVA displayed a NFI document referring to a DNA trace from a third individual, not relating to either of the two victims or the accused man, Brouwer replied he had not seen this document before.

He suggested the NFI must not have mentioned this DNA profile in its report and therefore the information never got to the prosecution or the court.

Brouwer said the forensic institute had to give a clear explanation of what happened. He described the situation as  exceptional sad. He also said it was also educational and added: "we made mistakes. Shouldn't we have looked more critically at this case?"

Brouwer would not outline what he thought went wrong in this case as it is the subject of an independent inquiry.

Meanwhile, Cees B. is threatening to sue to the prosecution service and the NFI.

[Copyright Expatica News + ANP 2005]

Subject: Dutch news



0 reactions to this article

0 reactions to this article

Discussion Forums

Americans in the Netherlands

reporting birth abroad

Relocating to the Netherlands

Taxation on Rental Apartments!

Housing in the Netherlands

Taxation on Rental Appartments?

Discuss Dutch Culture

High-quality fake passports, driver's licenses, ID

English in the Netherlands

Moved to Hengelo

participate in the forums

Inside Expatica
Setting up home in the Netherlands

Setting up home in the Netherlands

A guide to telephone, internet and television along with utility services water, electricity and gas in the Netherlands.

Dutch immigration and residency regulations

Dutch immigration and residency regulations

Lost in the Dutch immigration system? Look no further than this guide compiled for our Survival Guide 2012.

A brief introduction to the Netherlands

A brief introduction to the Netherlands

Expatica offers a whistle-stop tour of life in the modern Netherlands.

Giving birth in the Netherlands

Giving birth in the Netherlands

The challenges and benefits of the maternity system in the Netherlands and how it differs to other countries.