Ratifying START a 'national security imperative': Obama

18th November 2010, Comments 0 comments

US President Barack Obama warned Thursday it was a "national security imperative" for the Senate to ratify a new nuclear pact with Russia, escalating a showdown which has put his credibility at risk.

Obama gathered a line-up of distinguished US statesmen and women, piling pressure on Republican holdouts who oppose the pact's ratification in a "lame duck" session of Congress this year.

"It is a national security imperative that the United States ratify the new START treaty this year," Obama said, alongside former Republican secretaries of state and Cold War negotiators Henry Kissinger and James Baker.

"This is not about politics, this is about national security."

Obama said a failure to pass the new Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty agreed this year would harm America's national security, its "reset" relations with Moscow and keep US arms inspectors away from the Russian nuclear arsenal.

Asked about the pact's eventual fate in the Senate, Obama replied "I am confident that we should be able to get the votes."

But it appears far from clear that the treaty can garner 67 supporters in the chamber needed for a vote that would represent a much-needed foreign policy victory for the Obama White House.

The task will be even tougher in January when a new Congress, elected in November 2 polls in which Republicans routed Democrats, takes office.

In a further sign of trouble for the treaty, 10 Republican senators-elect called in a letter for the ratification to be delayed until next year.

Obama spoke hours before leaving for the NATO summit in Portugal, where he will see Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, whom he assured in Japan on Sunday that passing START was his top priority.

The White House was stunned earlier this week when Arizona Senator Jon Kyl, considered the key stumbling block to passage of the treaty, said he doubted the pact could be brought up in the "lame duck" session.

Failure to pass the deal would suggest that Obama is weakened politically after the mid-term polls cast doubt on his ability to pass major legislation and represent a personal humiliation in front of other world leaders.

Obama's guests in the Roosevelt Room of the White House, as well as Kissinger and Baker, included former Republican national security advisor Brent Scowcroft and former Democratic secretary of state Madeleine Albright.

Former senator Sam Nunn and his partner in Senate arms control work, Republican Senator Richard Lugar, were also in the room, along with president Bill Clinton's defense secretaries William Perry and William Cohen.

The treaty restricts each nation to a maximum of 1,550 deployed warheads, a cut of about 30 percent from a limit set in 2002.

It would also return US inspectors who have been unable to monitor Russia's arsenal since the agreement's predecessor lapsed in December 2009.

Obama said he had put Vice President Joe Biden, who spent more than 30 years in the Senate, in charge of the administration's push to pass START and asked him to work "day and night" until it is done.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who sat opposite Obama in Thursday's meeting, and who has good relations with her former Republican colleagues in the Senate, is also intensely involved.

"If we ratify this treaty we are going to have a verification regime in place to track Russia's strategic nuclear weapons, including US inspectors on the ground," Obama said.

"If we don't, then we don't have a verification regime, no inspectors, no insights into Russia's strategic arsenal, no framework for cooperation between the world's two nuclear superpowers."

The Pentagon also weighed in, saying Defense Secretary Robert Gates was making clear to senators it was was vital to have action on the treaty this year.

"We can't afford to delay into the next Congress," press secretary Geoff Morrell told reporters.

Kyl said Tuesday he opposed a vote because of "complex and unresolved issues" about "modernization" of the US nuclear arsenal -- ensuring that the US deterrent remains credible.

In response to Kyl's concerns, the White House weeks ago added 4.1 billion dollars over five years to its 10-year budget of 80 billion dollars for that purpose.

Other Republicans want assurances the pact will not hamper US missile defense plans, citing a unilateral statement from Moscow that moves on that front risked voiding the treaty.

© 2010 AFP

0 Comments To This Article