French support for Polanski stirs unease

30th September 2009, Comments 4 comments

The French government and cultural elite's support for fugitive film-maker Roman Polanski triggered unease on Tuesday as dissenting voices said the convicted sex offender should answer for his crime.

Paris -- The French government and cultural elite's support for fugitive film-maker Roman Polanski triggered unease on Tuesday as dissenting voices said the convicted sex offender should answer for his crime.

Government ministers and many from France's entertainment industry have rushed to defend Polanski, who was arrested on Saturday in Zurich three decades after pleading guilty to having unlawful sex with a 13-year-old girl.

Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner and Culture Minister Frederic Mitterrand both sharply criticised US and Swiss authorities over the arrest, which came as the Franco-Polish director arrived in Zurich to receive an award.

Kouchner branded the Oscar-winner's arrest "sinister" and Mitterrand said it was "absolutely dreadful" that the case should return to haunt Polanski so long after the offence.

The French directors' guild and some press have lined up behind the politicians, but an association defending child rape victims and a handful of dissidents made the case against Polanski.

"Is it normal that a man in his 40s is having sexual intercourse with a young child of 13?" said Brigitte Bancel Cabiac of the children's aid organisation Enfant Bleu.

"This man may have indisputable talent but he is nevertheless subject to the rules of our society," she said.

In 1978, Polanski pleaded guilty in a Californian court to "unlawful sexual intercourse", which is the state's term for statutory rape, agreeing a plea bargain after the girl testified she had been drugged and sodomised against her will.

He did not wait to be sentenced, and fled to Europe. He now faces extradition to the United States, sentencing for the original crime and possible charges relating to his flight from justice.

Daniel Cohn-Bendit, co-leader of the Greens in the European Parliament, expressed surprise that Kouchner and Mitterrand, a nephew of the late President Francois Mitterrand, had been so quick to take Polanski's side.

Mitterrand said Sunday that Polanski, director of "Rosemary's Baby" and an Oscar winner for "The Pianist", had been "thrown to the lions over an ancient affair that doesn't make any sense."

To jail him, he added, was "absolutely dreadful."

Kouchner said: "This affair is frankly a bit sinister ... Here is a man of such talent, recognised worldwide, recognised especially in the country where he was arrested. This is not nice at all."

Marc Laffineur, a member of parliament and senior member of President Nicolas Sarkozy's governing party, said the two ministers had been "a little too quick" to rush to Polanski's defence.

"An accusation of raping a 13-year-old child is not a trival thing, regardless of the person suspected of having done that," said Laffineur.

US directors Woody Allen, David Lynch and Martin Scorsese have signed a petition protesting Polanski's arrest but another prominent film-maker, Luc Besson, refused to line up behind Hollywood's show of support.

"I have a lot of affection for him, he is a man that I like very much ... but nobody should be above the law," Besson told RTL radio.

"I don't know the details of this case, but I think that when you don't show up for trial, you are taking a risk, " he added.

Veteran far-right leader Jean-Marie Le Pen has called on Mitterrand and Kouchner to resign, saying he was shocked by the support given to "this criminal paedophile".

AFP / Expatica

4 Comments To This Article

  • Vmeurent posted:

    on 1st October 2009, 00:19:05 - Reply

    Read the court documents which are public record. Polanski admitted that he knew the girl was 13 years old. He gave her champagne and qualules then had anal, vaginal and oral sex with her twice. He was charged with three counts of rape with minor and in the US theax penalty is life. The defense and prosecutor agreed to a plea bargain. Polanski plead guilty to a much lesser charge (that was a gift) and 4o some days (already served) in a psych hospital. No one rally knows howany years if any the judge was going to give Polanski, because Polanski, after pleading guilty, left the country before sentencing. Now, here we are. The LA DA has continued to follow him, but this time the found out well in advance about that he would be in Switzerland so there was enough time to start the process. No one should be above law - and everyone should be angry about crimes against children.
  • Vikki posted:

    on 30th September 2009, 20:05:40 - Reply

    The \\\"child\\\" was brought by her mother for some shots or modeling job.If you look at her pictures, I never knew a 13 yr. girl that looked like that back then. Does anyone remember the Errol Flynn case - look it up. Hollywood is filled with stage mothers who would sell their daughters for a \\\"good job\\\" in the movie industry. Polanski is not all to blame and I\\\'m sure the mother knew his reputation. Let it rest. We have enough to deal with here in USA like terrorism, murder, etc. every day; 30 something years ago in a Hollywood setting doesn\\\'t garner much sympathy with me now.
  • AndreaUKA posted:

    on 30th September 2009, 14:42:14 - Reply

    The thing is, the time-lapse is not an excuse, otherwise there'd be no point trying to track down Nazi war criminals, on the grounds that it was 60-odd years ago that they committed their atrocities.

    But the odd thing about this case is, the child (now 39) concerned has asked that the case be dropped, Polanski actually owns a house in Switzerland, and has been traveling back and forth now for years (which begs the question: why now?), and the judge (now deceased) in the original trial reneged on a plea bargain and seems suspect in the extreme. Call me a cynic if you like, but there's more to this than meets the eye methinks...
  • Robert posted:

    on 30th September 2009, 14:22:27 - Reply

    This case is not about rape or unlawful sexual intercourse. It is about a corrupt judge and prosecutor and the lamentable US 'justice' system.