Dutch anti-Islam MP's defence says do not blame messanger

19th October 2010, Comments 1 comment

A defence lawyer rejected accusations of hate speech and xenophobia against Dutch anti-Islam MP Geert Wilders on Tuesday, urging judges not to "shoot the messenger".

"Wilders makes the hatred of others visible," the politician's lawyer Bram Moszkowicz told judges of the Amsterdam district court on the first day of defence pleadings broadcast live via the Internet.

"Don't shoot the messenger," the lawyer said, arguing that the right to freedom of speech covered Wilders's criticism of the Islamic religion, which the politician describes as "violent".

Wilders, 47, went on trial on October 4 for inciting hatred by calling Islam "fascist" and likening the Koran to Hitler's "Mein Kampf".

The prosecution service asked the court for his acquittal last Friday, saying his criticism, though hurtful, was not criminal.

On Monday, Muslims told the court that Wilders was "dangerous" and his utterances were dividing a multicultural society that used to cohabit peacefully.

But Moszkowicz said his client "has criticism, and expresses that criticism. Regardless of the danger to his own life, he speaks about the dangers he sees around him that result from immigration."

The lawyer stressed, however, that his client "never said that the multicultural society should be abolished."

Wilders, who will give parliamentary support to a new, rightist coalition government inaugurated last Thursday, risks up to a year in jail or a 7,600-euro fine for comments made in his campaign to "stop the Islamisation of the Netherlands".

The target of death threats, he enjoys 24-hour protection.

The prosecution service had initially dismissed dozens of complaints against the politician in June 2008, citing his right to freedom of speech.

But appeals judges ordered in January 2009 that he stand trial as his utterances amounted to "sowing hatred" -- compelling the prosecution to mount a case against him.

Moszkowicz will conclude his arguments on Thursday.

Judgment is expected on November 5.

© 2010 AFP

1 Comment To This Article

  • blakeey posted:

    on 19th October 2010, 16:17:44 - Reply

    Why do you say that "he enjoys 24 hour protection"?

    It is doubtful that anyone enjoys it. What's wrong with saying he receives it or suffers it, or has to put up with it?