EXPATICA.COM - Happy living, abroad
Advertisement

today's features

Islamic bullfighting 11/12/2007 00:00

Geert Wilders Geert Wilders is making headlines again. Former politician Lousewies van der Laan gives her take on it.

Geert Wilders is making headlines again. Calling the Koran a fascist book and having a ten point plan for the de-Islamisation of Holland wasn't enough. He is now making a movie about the Koran, to show that it is a book that breeds violence and hatred. Clearly, he wants to follow in the footsteps of Ayaan Hirsi Ali who made a movie about how the Koran sanctifies violence against women. The film projected Koranic texts on women's bodies and got her on fundamentalists' most wanted lists. The director of the film, Theo van Gogh, was brutally murdered by a Muslim fundamentalist, who pinned a letter to his chest with a knife indicating that Ayaan was next.

Wilders is trying to make the point that Muslim fundamentalists are hot-heated assassins who will murder when someone dares to criticise their religion. I am sure that someone somewhere will oblige. This is becoming a global bullfight, whereby anyone waving a critical red flag at Islam can expect to have the bull charging his way in no time. The Danes discovered that during the cartoon affair and even English schoolteachers are at risk these days. Kids naming a teddy bear Mohammed can now elicit death-demanding demonstrations.

And all that violence is paying off. We have seen it even locally: the Hague Municipal Museum withdrew an exhibit featuring gay love, when it thought one of the pictures might offend Muslims. They admitted that artistically there was every reason to show them, but +-were afraid of possible violence. It has come to the point where we don't even wait for people to feel offended. We self-censure our culture on the assumption that Muslims are tender-hearted children who cannot handle criticism or debate.

You would think that all of Holland would rally to the defence of freedom of art and freedom of speech. The opposite is happening. Doekle Terpstra, former leader of the Christian trade union and one of our national icons of reasonableness, wants to create a popular movement against Wilders. When Wilders' movie comes out Terpstra wants massive demonstrations against it on the Maliefield. No one yet knows what will be in the movie, but the Organisation of Islamic groups in the Netherlands have already threatened an injunction. Apparently any criticism of the Koran is not allowed. I don't hear Terpstra, a devout Christian, saying the Koran is a perfect book above critique. He just doesn't want to upset anyone. Just like the Municipal Museum.

I would suggest to the Islamic groups to make their own movie, showing – if that is their point – that the Koran is a beautiful and inspiring book that prohibits violence. Then people can decide which movie they would like to see. Perhaps both, so that reasonable viewpoints can be developed, without threats either way. I like to live in a world where people can make movies, museums can put on exhibits and kids can name Teddy bears any way they like. That is what I'll go demonstrate on the Maliefield for.

7 December 2007

Lousewies van der Laan is a former MP and MEP for the liberal party D66. She writes a fortnightly column for the expat community in Holland to help you enter into current Dutch debates. If you have comments or would like to propose topics to understand Dutch politics better: please write to lousewies@gmail.com.


 

4 reactions to this article

Marcel Houtman posted: 18-12-2007 | 10:15 PM

check out an interview with Wilders here:http://www.skoeps.nl/index.php?module=Item

MarkE posted: 07-01-2008 | 1:22 PM

I am getting very worried that this has gone beyond a point where there can be rational debate. While I would be reluctant to deliberately insult someone or their beliefs, I would prefer to be free to express my opinions without fear of violence. The problem is that, for whatever reason, Islam is perceived as being something one cannot criticise without the fear of violence. This has had two effects; one is that perfectly reasonable discussions, books and films are being self-censored and free speach thus denied, and the other is that those who want to criticise the religion find themselves allied with some very unpleasant extremists.

For the record I have no religious faith and wonder what motivates someone to devise an imaginary friend who tells you to obey his (her, its?) priests without question (deliberately provocative wording of a reasonable statement). This comment applies to all religions equally.

Bob posted: 22-01-2008 | 12:24 AM

I agree if they censore this you better censore any religous talk and god forbid anyone disagrees with a muslim or thinks thier belief system is all screwed up or that muhammed is a false prophet.
I reccomend this book by Dr. Robert Morey Islamic Invasion it shows what muslims believe and how the have infiltrated the world.

Q'eR posted: 09-04-2008 | 6:25 PM

All religions have their own fanatic believers. The problem here is when those believers start to harm others in the name of religion. Well, it sucks. They'll just trigger another world war. If the Moslems were pissed off by this movie then do something about the Jihad or whatever. Nobody will make this kind of movie if not because of the terrorists that claim they slaughter in the name of Allah. Bullshit. Those Jihads are all blood-thirst-brainless-mad-mammals. They question others morale then what about their own. So killing and terrorizing is morally right??

Get Free tickets Here Book Your Stand Here
E-Specials

archive

word of the day : Goedendag

meaning : Good morning

phrase of the day : En u?

meaning : And you?

empowered by

internaxx

Index Last Var.(%)
BEL 20 3002.39 -2.08
DAX 6127.44 -2.42
IBEX 30 11139.7 -2.97
CAC 40 4196.66 -2.49
FTSE 100 5240.7 -2.26
AEX 389.22 -2.00
DJIA 11172.52 -0.14
Nasdaq 2246.32 -0.56
MIB 30 28131 -2.43
TSX Composite 12712.19 -0.80
ASX 4949.5 -2.01
Hang seng 19933.28 -2.24
Straits Times 2574.21 -1.97

also on expatica