EXPATICA.COM - Happy living, abroad
Advertisement

today's features

Anti-Islam film Fitna online 28/03/2008 00:00

Geert Wilders' anti-Islam movie has gone online. The film, titled Fitna or ‘Ordeal' or 'Strife' in Arabic, shows verses of the Qur'an alternating with graphic scenes of recent acts of terror: the 9/11 attacks on the Twin Towers in New York, the charred bodies of train passengers in Madrid, gruesome images from atrocities in London and Somalia. By Theo Tamis.

Link to Fitna the movie.

 

Fitna screenshot"Those who have disbelieved our signs, we shall roast them in Hell", according to Surah 4, verse 56, quoted in the 15-minute production. Wilders' message is clear: be warned because Islam's true purpose is to conquer the world and destroy our freedom and democratic systems.


Towards the end, a hand is shown grabbing a page of the Qur'an; the image is accompanied by the sound of tearing paper. Dutch subtitles then explain that the sound was that of a page being torn from a telephone book. In a written declaration, Mr Wilders declares that it is not up to him to tear malicious verses out of the Koran, but that Muslims themselves must do that.

 

Noting in the film that the number of Muslims in the Netherlands has risen to nearly one million in recent decades, he observes that the time has now come for Islamist ideology to be defeated.

 

The alternative is bleak: after the words "The Netherlands in the future?", Fitna shows pictures of children with blood on their faces, a woman being stoned and an image of genital mutilation. After the words "Stop Islamisation. Defend our freedom", it shows the Danish cartoon of the Prophet Mohammad with a bomb under his turban accompanied by the sound of ticking.

 

Initial reactions
The film is set to trigger strong emotions, not only in the Muslim world, but in Europe as well. For that reason, the Dutch government had recently warned Mr Wilders, an MP for the rightwing Freedom Party (PVV), not to release the film.

Dutch broadcasters refused to show it and a US-based web service deactivated the site for the film at the weekend after receiving complaints.

 

Fitna screenshot"No provocation"
The first to address the assembled press was Mr Wilders himself, who said the film was not intended as a "provocation", but as a "final warning" and an invitation to Muslims to join the debate about Islam. Fitna, he said, "depicted the hard realities" of modern life and "now we have to draw the political conclusions".

Speaking on prime time news, Islam expert Maurits Berger agreed that the film should not be seen as a provocation, nor dismissed as blasphemous. "It presents a succession of images which we have all seen in recent years," he said. The anticipated widespread demonstrations in the Muslim world, Mr Berger added, "would be an exaggerated response".

 

PM Balkenende
Commenting on the film, Dutch Prime Minister Jan Peter Balkenende said at press conference: "The film equates Islam with violence. We reject that interpretation. [...] The government feels supported by the balanced initial reactions from Muslim organisations in the Netherlands."

Spokesmen for these organisations were quoted as expressing relief: "The pictures are atrocious, but the film is not as shocking as expected" and "Fitna represents a caricature of Islam". National alert levels, which recently went up, have not been raised any further.

 

 28 March 2008

 

[Copyright Radio Netherlands] 

5 reactions to this article

Tasneem posted: 30-03-2008 | 10:26 PM

In the Name of Allah. Most Gracious, Most Merciful.<br> offfffffff, when will you start using your minds people,,,,,,,,,stop liessssssss. How is the freedom of speech is good when it tells and spread lies...shame on u people..<br /> <br /> http://www.islamhouse.com/p/71709<br /> http://english.islamway.com/bindex.php?section=topics<br /> http://www.eng.sbeelalislam.net/<br /> <br /> www.harunyahia.com

Mdina posted: 01-04-2008 | 1:41 PM

Anyone who 'thinks' who visits any of the websites you suggest will certainly think again before taking you seriously again.

albrecht posted: 03-04-2008 | 4:47 PM

Christianity, particularly prior to the Reformation under the Catholics, was extremely brutal at times. As were most religions at some point in time. The problem is Islam has no "one person" or "strong/smart enough leader" to bring about a likewise 'reformation' or to issue a global authoritative view that violence and misogny is wrong. Also, the Koran itself appears to dwell on what, to use the term loosely, an similiar "Old Testament" viewpoint, whereas the Bible has the "Newer" part which takes away much of the judgementalism, sexism, and violence from the "old law". Islam sticks to laws written centuries ago whereas Christians/Jews, for the most part, have modernised, had reformations, had schisms, and allowed secular states and religious tolerance. Something Muslims still won't allow without a fight or protest in many cases. Even the worst Christians today, however, don't do acts like a large number of Muslims do. You don't hear of "US Bible Thumpers" stoning people, beheading people, throwing acid in the face of their women, killing their own daughters over "honour", not allowing girls in school, forcing drapes on women, etc. You do, on occaision, find individual people, or sometimes cults, that kill but those are few and far between whereas some of these "customs" are common in the Islamic world. They need to join, at minimum, the 18th or 19th century- which was still exploitative in Europe but not as much as before. It is probably hopeless to expect them to join the civilised world anytime soon.

Mdina posted: 04-04-2008 | 9:50 AM

abrecht, you certainly know your stuff and what you say makes sense. I'm not an expert in world religions, however I am aware that Islam builds on its primitive Jewish predecessors - selecting bits and pieces to make the whole. I'm currently reading intellectual (and atheist) Christopher Hitchen's book 'God is not Great'. In his chapter, "The Koran is borrowed" he mentions that many authorities believe that the Koran can only be read (and heard) in Arabic - it is not translatable. Which leaves us with "the absurd and potentially dangerous conclusion that god was a monoglot." He also admits that you cannot challenge or investigate the claims of Islam without swift and extremely harsh repression. "Provisionally then, one is entitled to conclude that the apparent unity and confidence of the faith is a mask for a very deep and probably justifiable insecurity.

Not to mention the bloody feuds BETWEEN different schools of Islam, resulting in strictly inter-Muslim accusations of heresy and profanity and in terrible acts of violence.

Mdina posted: 04-04-2008 | 9:52 AM

...Islam builds on its primitive Jewish and Christian predecessors -....

E-Specials

archive

word of the day : Goedendag

meaning : Good morning

phrase of the day : Kunt u wat langzamer spreken, alstublieft?

meaning : Could you speak more slowly, please?

empowered by

internaxx

Index Last Var.(%)
BEL 20 3827.4 -0.40
DAX 7060.19 0.34
IBEX 30 14016.4 -0.27
CAC 40 4998.67 0.45
FTSE 100 6211.9 -0.14
AEX 480.48 -0.33
DJIA 12832.18 -0.34
Nasdaq 2495.12 0.27
MIB 30 34555 0.18
TSX Composite 14616.7 -0.34
ASX 5883.2 -0.18
Hang seng 25552.77 1.95
Straits Times 3203.42 0.73

also on expatica