blogs
Travellers of conscience, and tourists (part II) 08/05/2007 00:00
Going on holiday? Thinking about a trip to a foreign land with an affable climate? Are you even thinking of becoming a Traveller of Conscience? Michael Dawkes continues his gentle persuasion.
Mind your step.
I know that you know that it's a bad idea to plant dirty great carbon footprints all over the planet, but did you know it's quite useless these days thumbing your way through your old atlas in an attempt to decide where to plant them? Indeed, you may not find the place you seek. 
The dreaded name change syndrome is rife. Thanks to American-style "diplomacy by other means" in the seventies, the land of the rural Khmers was devastated by high-altitude bombing and the sowing of gigantic minefields. Out of the craters and into the power vacuum slithered a new breed of exterminator. Cambodia became Kampuchea and skulls began to stack up. America suddenly became indifferent and the skulls were stacked higher.
It must be the greatest irony ever that Kampuchea had to be rescued from itself by America's nemesis. The newly formed nation of Vietnam, the very country that America had tried to prevent from ever existing, probably prevented what could have become known as the Asian Holocaust.
The land of the Khmers, epitomised by the magnificent Angkor Wat, was duly renamed, er, Cambodia. It's beautiful but quite corrupt. If you are ethically inclined it's a minefield. If you fancy a walk in the forest, that's a minefield, too.
The Vietnamese celebrated nationhood by changing one important name in their homeland. Saigon became Ho Chi Minh City. But like Leningrad was to St. Petersburg there is no resonance to cities named after ideologues.
Imagine a musical called Miss Ho Chi Minh City? I doubt it would have struck the same cords in London's West End or on Broadway as "Miss Saigon."
Peking changed to Beijing. Do you know anyone who eats Beijing duck? Mumbai replaced Bombay but the smell of the old city remains the same.
Remember the Burmese Road to Mandalay? That romantic road travelled by Bob and Bing has been blocked by another bunch of ruthless, crooked and cowardly killers of indigenous peoples. Yes, and just like the Americans in Cambodia, we all stood casually by as murderous morons chopped down all the teak for profit, burned the rest of the forest for fun and slaughtered anyone who stood in the way.
Then they renamed Burma, Myanmar. They've now forsaken their capital city, Rangoon. With the help of slave labour they've built themselves a brand new city, for themselves. It's called Naypidaw, meaning abode of kings. As if! But it has a nice ring to it, what? The Travel Industry will like it. They'll get you there, somehow, even if they have to use specialist travel companies that operate in foreign lands.
Tourists still go there. A Traveller of Conscience wouldn't, of course. He or she knows that their money would be used to keep thugs in jackboot polish and travel agents in clover.
Fancy a trip down the old Silk Road? How about a journey to Samarkand in Uzbekistan; to Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, Kyrgyzstan, and any other 'stan' so long as it trips nicely off a travel agent's silver tongue.
Corrupt Central Asian regimes will be cajoled and bribed by western travel interests, or Russians, to think about tourists. They'll set up construction companies run by the relatives of oligarchs who will build concrete boxes to cater to creature comforts. Some will fall into the hands of Western hotel chains, whose shareholders will insist upon full occupancy. Ethical standards will plummet like high-rise elevators supported on cheap cables: so beware.
These 'hospitality boxes' will be built alongside dirt roads clad with reinforced tarmac to smooth the way for gas and oil tankers and Humvees. At the end of the road is China. The Chinese are already building their section of the road, a road that brings them westwards and ever closer to gas and oil fields.
(If you want to know anything about the Chinese authorities and their intentions – it's a big subject - just ask the Tibetans.)
The local locals, as ever, will be represented by old men on carts pulled by willing asses. They will be expected to cede Right of Way to gross SUVs and eat the dust of the 'bizness-asses' driving them. Seeing, understanding and learning nothing, theirs and our 'bizness-asses' will profit through despoliation, pollution and even through global warming.
But the Traveller of Conscience has seen the light. He and she already ride a bike to maintain a low carbon profile. He and she are willing to explore back roads and suffer the dust of the dirt track. At the end of the track they will get to meet real people, accept invitations to weddings and feasts graciously and always offer to help with the washing-up.
Having listened and learned they will maintain high standards on behalf of those who don't, won't, or care.
Won't we?
8 May 2007
Your feedback is welcome. Please send any comments to feedback@expatica.com.
[Copyright Michael Dawkes 2007]
disscussion forum
- Discuss Dutch Culture Dutch Staring/Eye Contact, by fryslanboppe 16/10/2008 05:56
- International News OBAMA or NOBAMA, by lissa0915 16/10/2008 03:49
- Soapbox warning on Conrad.nl, by jllpreditor 16/10/2008 01:03
- Relationships Dutchie's attitude towards $, by Roksalana 16/10/2008 00:14
- Legal Problems New Yorker to NL, by Yanique1018 15/10/2008 23:58
archive
word of the day : Aanstellen
meaning : to appoint
phrase of the day : Ik heet...
meaning : My name is...
- Hello Frank and Expatica My question has to do with the current financial crisis. After having sold my U.K. house, I deposited the money offshore, which I declare to the tax authorities (I do not have 30% ruling). the offshore savings are only guaranteed up to 15000. However, considering the acute financial crisis and instability of the banks, I would feel safer if I had the money physically in a safe deposit box and actually even trust friends and family and my home with small chunks of it rather than the banks. My question is, how do I declare this to the tax authorities without proof of a bank statement? Would I have to redeposit the money to get an end of year statement and then withdraw it again? Thanks. I am sure that other expats are also worried about the lack of offshore guarantees. Annette H Dear Annette, Thank you for a very topical question. The part of my answer within my field of professional expertise is that you should not worry. If you state the amount of cash at hand as per the relevant moments for box 3 (in most cases: January 1 and December 31) in the correct lines in your return (assets in box 3), you fully comply with tax law. Should your total of assets vary substantially without apparent reason, that may of course attract the attention of tax authorities for investigation. Please also note that some offshore banks are obliged to withhold a retention tax on interest, which may be difficult to receive back. But the parts of my answer that are beyond my professional expertise and are therefore tentative in nature, but may be more important. Any bank to cash or vice versa movement of EUR 15,000 or more may trigger an obligatory Unusual Transaction Report (melding ongebruikelijke transactie) which may be a reason to launch a financial investigation. Further, carrying cash across EU borders of EUR 10,000 or more must be reported to customs. Detailed information: http://www.douane.nl/overig/verordening_liquide_middelen/en/ . Last: I can not readily find whether a law proposal has been entered into force that makes cash of more than EUR 2,000 when found upon investigation liable for immediate seizure unless you provide a reasonable explanation. All these measures have been proposed to counter illegal activities including money laundering. Despite your opinion on these measures, I would say: not worth the potential trouble. Apart from that, European authorities have drastically increased their bank deposited money guarantees in order to inspire you to leave your money in the bank, as lack of such money may cause further bank trouble. Bank deposits by private persons and small companies with Dutch licensed banks are guaranteed by the Dutch Central Bank up to EUR 100,000 per account. Therefore, with our Dutch tradition to expect much of their authorities presumed to work, you should be reasonably safe when you spread your assets over various private accounts of up to EUR 100,000 with Dutch banks. For completeness’ sake, you will appreciate that my answers in this paragraph are tentative. I trust t have informed you appropriately. Kind regards, Frank de Bats Tax Lawyer - De Bats Beheer BV - 27155273 P Herberg 63 - NL-2264 KP Leidschendam T +31 6 201 29 830 F +31 84 728 729 6 E info@frankdebats.nl Asked by : Helena Cocoa Answered by : Tax Expert Frank de Bats
internaxx
| Index | Last | Var.(%) |
|---|
also on expatica
- Share your content! Expatica is looking for readers who want to contribute regularly to our websites.
- Expatica Classifieds Read and publish classified ads quickly, easily, and for free!
- A parents' guide to international education Confused by the options? Here's an introduction to international education in the Netherlands.
- Join the Expatica community Meet, make friends and network with other internationals just like you
- Expatica’s 2008 Expat Survey Expatica is conducting an audience survey to better understand our readers. Take the survey here.
- Renting or buying in the Netherlands? Here is our introduction to the housing market in the Netherlands. Should you rent or buy?
- What is your life like as an “expat”? Share your expat experience as a panel member of the European Expat Panel.
- O’Dance Holiday - “VIva Cuba” Join us for our next O’ Dance holiday to sunny Cuba! A winter evasion with a special tailor made programme on 9th to 16th or 19th December.























