EU 'aware of German air safety lapses' before Alps crash

EU 'aware of German air safety lapses' before Alps crash

4th April 2015, Comments 1 comment

The European Aviation Safety Agency had voiced concerns over Germany's "non-conformity" with air safety rules before the Germanwings air crash which killed 150 people, especially on air crew health monitoring, a spokesman told AFP Saturday.

The EASA, an EU agency, "had pointed out several cases of non-conformity," spokesman Dominique Fouda said, confirming a Wall Street Journal report.

"On the basis of the EASA recommendations the European Commission launched, in late 2014, a process calling for accountability from Germany," he continued.

Andreas Lubitz, the co-pilot suspected of deliberately crashing a Germanwings airliner on March 24, had searched online for information about suicide and cockpit doors, according to prosecutors.

All 150 people on board Flight 4U9525 from Barcelona to Duesseldorf were killed when it crashed into the Alps in the bloodiest such disaster on French soil in decades.

German prosecutors have said Lubitz was diagnosed as suicidal "several years ago", before he became a pilot.

The parent company of Germanwings, German flag carrier Lufthansa, has come under huge pressure after it emerged that Lubitz had informed his bosses that he had suffered from severe depression.

Lufthansa said the co-pilot had told the airline in 2009 about his illness after interrupting his flight training.

Doctors had recently found no sign that Lubitz, 27, intended to hurt himself or others, but he was receiving treatment from neurologists and psychiatrists who had signed him off sick from work a number of times, including on the day of the crash.

Lufthansa chief Carsten Spohr has said the airline was utterly unaware of any health issues that could have compromised Lubitz's fitness to fly, calling him "100-percent airworthy".

According to Saturday's edition of the Wall Street Journal, "EU officials said Germany's air-safety regulator suffered from chronic staffing shortfalls that could undermine its ability to run checks of carriers and crew, including medical checks."

An EU Commission spokesman told AFP that, based on the EASA findings, it had "told Germany to get its aviation industry in conformity" with the rules.

"Germany's responses are currently being evaluated," he added.

"This is part of a continuous system of supervision" in a process which can culminate in corrective action.


© 2015 AFP

1 Comment To This Article

  • Oma posted:

    on 9th April 2015, 05:41:44 - Reply

    Testimonies received by the French Air Force reveal how witnesses heard an explosion, saw smoke and a piece of fuselage detached from the aircraft before impact. Since a midair explosion was confirmed to have occurred before the actual crash, why were French officials prompt in leaking confidential and incomplete findings to media that prematurely put Pilot Lubitz in a criminal frame? Does industry fact that the Airbus A320 family of jetliners (A318, A319, A320, A321) are manufactured by the aircraft manufacturing division of Airbus Group (nee European Aeronautic Defence & Space Co.) of Blagnac, Tolouse, France have any bearing on the leak? To what end, and for whose benefit? Does recent French parliamentary probe revealing that 47% of European jihadists known to have travelled to Islamic State-held Iraq and Syria are French and that 200 have returned to France have any relevance to recent Airbus A320 mysterious crashes or disappearances? Granting without admitting that the pilot in the cockpit is not any established system's scapegoat and could be held responsible for the crash of GermanWings Flight 9525, has it ever occurred to anyone that Psychiatry's anti-depression remedies work adverse side-effects over time, to the extent that Pilot Lubitz needed several doctors' opinions to comprehend his drug-damaged condition, and that such side-effects could have built up a biochemical domination up to the day the crash occurred, deliberately or accidentally?